by Ron Joseph
November, 2005
Electrostatic Spray Guns and Spray Painting
Q. If the painted object can be insulated, is there any difference between having
a high positive charge on the paint gun (an electrostatic spray gun) and instead
put a high positive charge on the object to be painted? I realize there would
be a shock hazard using the latter. A. Many years ago Caterpillar tried to reverse the polarity of the painting
process by doing something similar to what you have suggested. I seem to remember
that the transfer efficiency improved significantly and that from a painting
perspective it was very successful. They found that the new setup was extremely
hazardous, because the entire machine had to be isolated. If I remember correctly,
the charged part now became a huge capacitor. I don't know if they continued
to pursue this concept, but I do know that I haven't read or seen this being
done in practice since that time.
Best wishes,
Ron Joseph
|